Test-Retest repeatability of automated threshold audiometry in Nicaraguan schoolchildren.

OBJECTIVE: Automated threshold audiometry (ATA) could increase access to paediatric hearing assessment in low- and middle-income countries, but few studies have evaluated test-retest repeatability of ATA in children. This study aims to analyse test-retest repeatability of ATA and to identify factors that affect the reliability of this method. DESIGN: ATA was performed twice in a cohort of Nicaraguan schoolchildren. During testing, the proportion of responses occurring in the absence of a stimulus was measured by calculating a stimulus response false positive rate (SRFP). Absolute test-retest repeatability was determined between the two trials, as well as the impact of age, gender, ambient noise, head circumference, and SRFP on these results. STUDY SAMPLE: 807 children were randomly selected from 35 schools in northern Nicaragua. RESULTS: Across all frequencies, the absolute value of the difference between measurements was 5.5 ± 7.8 dB. 89.6% of test-retest differences were within 10 dB. Intra-class correlation coefficients between the two measurements showed that lower SRFP was associated with improved repeatability. No effect of age, gender, or ambient noise was found. CONCLUSIONS: ATA produced moderate test-retest repeatability in Nicaraguan schoolchildren. Participant testing behaviours, such as delayed or otherwise inappropriate response patterns, significantly impacts the repeatability of these measurements.

Perceptions of Sound Quality and Enjoyment After Cochlear Implantation.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the quality and enjoyment of sound by cochlear implant (CI) recipients and identify predictors of these outcomes after cochlear implantation. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: A tertiary care hospital. METHODS: Surveys based on the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index were sent to all patients who received a CI at a tertiary care hospital from 2000 to 2019. Survey questions prompted CI recipients to characterize enjoyment and quality of voices, music, and various sounds. RESULTS: Of the 339 surveys, 60 (17.7%) were returned with complete data. CI recipients had a mean ± SD age of 62.5 ± 17.4 years with a mean 8.0 ± 6.1 years since CI surgery. Older current age and age at implantation significantly predicted lower current sound quality (P < .05) and sound enjoyment (P < .05), as well as worsening of sound quality (P < .05) and sound enjoyment (P < .05) over time. Greater length of implantation was associated with higher reported quality and enjoyment (r = 0.4, P < .001; r = 0.4, P < .05), as well as improvement of sound quality (r = 0.3, P < .05) but not sound enjoyment over time. CONCLUSION: Recipients who had CIs for a longer period had improved quality of sound perception, suggesting a degree of adaptation. However, CI recipients with implantation at an older age reported poorer sound quality and enjoyment as well as worsening sound quality and enjoyment over time, indicating that age-related changes influence outcomes of cochlear implantation.

Preoperative Criteria Predict Operative Time Variability Within Tympanoplasty Procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To identify preoperative patient and surgical parameters that predict operative time variability within tympanoplasty current procedural terminology (CPT) codes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty eight patients who underwent tympanoplasty (CPT code 69631) or tympanoplasty with ossicular chain reconstruction (69633) by a single surgeon over 3 years. INTERVENTIONS: Procedures were preoperatively assigned a complexity modifier: Level 1 (small or posterior perforation able to be repaired via transcanal approach), Level 2 (large perforation or other factor requiring postauricular approach), or Level 3 (cholesteatoma or severe infection). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total in-room time (nonoperative time plus actual operative time). RESULTS: Consideration of preoperative parameters including surgical complexity, surgical facility, use of facial nerve monitoring, laser usage, resident involvement, revision surgery, and underlying patient characteristics (American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] score, body mass index [BMI]) accounted for up to 69% of surgical time variance. Across both CPT codes, surgical complexity levels accurately stratified operative times (p < 0.05). Total time was longer (by 30.0 min for 69631, 55.4 min for 69633) in Level 3 procedures compared with Level 2, while Level 1 cases were shorter (27.6, 33.9 min). Resident involvement added 25 and 32 minutes to total time (p < 0.02). Nonoperative preparation times were longer (22.1, 15.4 min) in the main hospital compared with ambulatory surgical center (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is significant surgical time variability within tympanoplasty CPT codes, which can be accurately predicted by the preoperative assignment of complexity level modifiers and consideration of patient and surgical factors. Application of complexity modifiers can enable more efficient surgical scheduling.